<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Tom&#039;s Thoughts &#187; Software</title>
	<atom:link href="http://compton.nu/category/software/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://compton.nu</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2012 17:03:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Research Fail</title>
		<link>http://compton.nu/2010/02/research-fail/</link>
		<comments>http://compton.nu/2010/02/research-fail/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 19:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://compton.nu/?p=226</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently I received a fairly typical &#8220;please do my research for me&#8221; email from a graduate student at a US university. It related to an open source software project I&#8217;ve done some work on and asked a couple of questions: 1. I was wondering if [project] has gone under any major restructuring/redesign initiative in its [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently I received a fairly typical &#8220;please do my research for me&#8221; email from a graduate student at a US university. It related to an open source software project I&#8217;ve done some work on and asked a couple of questions:</p>
<blockquote><p>1. I was wondering if [project] has gone under any major restructuring/redesign initiative in its history. Restructuring/redesign initiative can be defined as a concerted effort during a time period in which major changes were applied to the code base to improve software architecture/design while little or no functional enhancement was made.</p>
<p>2. If the project has gone under such an initiative, then would it be possible for you to give the dates or revision/release numbers that are &#8220;right before&#8221; and &#8220;right after&#8221; this structuring effort? I would like to checkout the source code from the repository to compare structural measurements that belong to &#8220;before&#8221; and &#8220;after&#8221; snapshots. Note that the dates and revision/release numbers should be right before and right after the initiative because I would like to be able to isolate and observe the effects of this effort.</p></blockquote>
<p>Both these questions, and the second one in particular, would call for a considerable amount of work to be done in order to answer them even if it were possible to get past the wooliness of the first question and decide which changes counted.</p>
<p>The real issue however, is that surely the point of being a research student is to do research to answer whatever question you have set yourself? Not just to email lots of other people and ask them to do the work for you&#8230;</p>
<p>In this case the originator in fact implied in a subsequent email (after he decided that my lack of reply meant he should ignore the fact that I had unsubscribed from his list and email me again and I had told him exactly what I thought of this) that he emailed somewhere in the region of 3000 people with this request.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://compton.nu/2010/02/research-fail/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OpenOffice is Way Too Clever</title>
		<link>http://compton.nu/2009/11/openoffice-is-way-too-clever/</link>
		<comments>http://compton.nu/2009/11/openoffice-is-way-too-clever/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 19:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.compton.nu/?p=81</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OpenOffice really is way too clever for it&#8217;s own good&#8230; It&#8217;s latest massive fail in the &#8220;I know what you want better than you do&#8221; department is to decide that just because I already have an instance of OpenOffice running on my desktop what I really want when I type &#8220;oocalc foo.ods&#8221; is for it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.openoffice.org/">OpenOffice</a> really is way too clever for it&#8217;s own good&#8230;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s latest massive fail in the &#8220;I know what you want better than you do&#8221; department is to decide that just because I already have an instance of OpenOffice running on my desktop what I really want when I type &#8220;oocalc foo.ods&#8221; is for it to open the document using the existing instance and, more problematically, on the same X display.</p>
<p>The only problem with which is that I&#8217;m now on my laptop and want this spreadsheet to appear there where I can actually edit it!</p>
<p>For Pete&#8217;s sake people &#8211; either launch it in a new process when the X display is different or teach it to support multiple X displays with different documents displayed on different X displays from the single process!</p>
<p>At the very least could you please do what Firefox does and provide a switch to force a new process to be started..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://compton.nu/2009/11/openoffice-is-way-too-clever/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

